Discussion of “IT”

Random Thoughts
*Minor spoikers ahead. Proceed with caution.**
The thoughts expressed here are mine.

This was written in response to the discussion posted by Tyson Adams.

I was a fan of the Goosebumps books when I was six. So naturally I thought I was perfectly capable of handling the “It” miniseries when it was released. To say I was terrified was an understatement. But I was hooked. I dropped those Goosebumps like a bad habit and started reading Stephen King.

It, the book, was quite engrossing, but not so much scary. I liked the way the news reports were presented, and even the narrative of Pennywise gave us a new way of seeing him. But the chemistry with the Loser’s Club was really the core of it. Of course, there was that strange scene near the end of the kid’s journey that unified them and allowed them to become adults all in one go. Let’s just say, King’s voice of how was quite the odd method of achieving that goal. But otherwise, I rather enjoyed the story.

I’ve seen the miniseries from time to time over the years and remember those frights with fond appreciation. But I waited to watch “It” again in favor of having a somewhat cleansed palette. The theatrical version was so far beyond what I’d hoped for, that I saw it again a second time this past weekend. (Trust me, having C-PTSD and carefully planning an excursion into a dark theater full of people wasn’t easy.) The new Pennywise isn’t like Tim Curry’s portrayal, where he was apt to start cracking jokes, playing on actual clown humor around the few “scary” moments where he appeared as period-specific monsters.

Bill Skarsgard’s version is childlike in nature, but he has a deep hatred for kids. You can tell from the first, and notably more infamous “Georgie” scene. The way he terrifies his victims before attacking them is almost like marinating his food just the way he likes, and when the kids are good and terrified, he’s ready to save them for hibernation time. And he does this in various forms, depending on the individual fears of that child. For instance, rather than seeing Pennywise as the wolfman, Ritchie is just afraid of clowns, and naturally gets stuck in a room full of them. This adds a bit of timelessness to the movie. But when It is ready to take them for good, he toys with the kids in an almost animalistic way, much like a lion might play with a gazelle before ripping out its throat. But when he does this, his movements, voice, and abilities to shift reality are erratic, sometimes disturbingly fast, and very unpredictable, which is ultimately what makes this Pennywise so terrifying.

Of course, after my second viewing of the new movie, I went back to watch to miniseries. I have to say, the miniseries doesn’t do the movie justice. I spent most of my time rolling my eyes at the horrid acting (aside from Curry’s portrayal) and wondering how I was actually that scared at all in the first place. But the eyes of a young child, see much differently than adults. I can’t imagine how kids will react to this movie. I’m certain I won’t be allowing my son to see it until he’s at least the same age as the Loser’s Club.

© Sarah Doughty

19 thoughts on “Discussion of “IT”

  1. I still can’t make my mind up about the new movie. It was scary, yes. But in a boo-there’s-a-monster-in-the-cupboard scary. Not in a he’s-all-around-and-coming-for-you scary. For me it can never be as scary as the book – that is still the only truly terrifying thing I’ve ever read.

    Liked by 1 person

  2. I have Meniere’s and haven’t been to a theater in years, so I’ll have to wait for this to come out on blueray, but this I have been a fan of King since Carrie, and although some of the movies translate well, others do not. Sounds like this one does. Thanks for the review!

    Liked by 1 person

  3. I watched the original IT mini-series when I was age 8… terrifying but I believe it shaped my likeness of horror movies. Watching IT in my family felt like a coming of age event LOL 😉

    Liked by 2 people

    1. Yes, the R reading is apt because you see more of the monster beneath the clown, and you see him attack Georgie and the kids fighting him, among the language. This version of Pennywise never tried to be funny. He managed to get Georgie to laugh about popcorn and then his mood completely shifted, it was almost like a gutteral growl. And other than seeing his eyes change color a few moments later, you don’t know what’s coming (well, you know something is, because of this scene’s iconic nature) because he doesn’t strike until he bites. There’s no buildup of anger like Curry’s portrayal. This unpredictability is what really makes this one work.

      Liked by 1 person

  4. I let my ten-year-old watch the movie, and he loved Bill Skaarsgard as Pennywise. He didn’t seem afraid at all, and that makes sense because the movie is not, nor has the story ever been intended to be, particularly scary. It’s a story about life and coming of age.

    As preparation, the family watch It (the miniseries) together, and while my son loved Tim Curry, he asked be afterward “Is this what passed for horror back then?”

    This generation has been ruined by the likes of SAW, The Walking Dead, etc.

    Liked by 3 people

    1. I know King hasn’t had the best track record with books, but generally some of his stories are more poignant than others. If you like horror at all, especially the kind with an actual story behind it, this movie would be a good one to see. It was well adapted to film.

      Liked by 1 person

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.